<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Analysis: Deconstruction of a &quot;Chick Flick&quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1025</link>
      <description>Real Kato Comments</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate></pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 06:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>Ken's RSS Script</generator>
      <item>
         <title>Analysis: Deconstruction of a &quot;Chick Flick&quot;</title>
         <link>http://www.realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1025</link>
         <description>There are many movies which have been tagged with the not-so-flattering label "chick flick". Sometimes people think a movie is a chick flick because it features women in strong leading roles. But I'm not sure that's really what it is.&lt;br/&gt;</description>
         <author>Ken</author>
         <pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
         <guid>http://www.realkato.com/blog.php?pid=1025</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
