On the Matter of Roe vs. Wade

Comment by Crouching Hamster (Guest)

Crouching Hamster (Guest) — Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:13:31 +0000

P.S. - I think you need to update this with Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which replaced the state's compelling interest standard with Justice O'Connor's "undue burden" standard.

The dissents in that case were harsh, overreaching, and nothing but dicta. And they all knew it.

Comment by Crouching Hamster (Guest)

Crouching Hamster (Guest) — Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:38:23 +0000

Well done.
However I'm still not worried about this one.

On the Matter of Roe vs. Wade

Ken — Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:09:31 +0000

Part 1 of a two-part article. Today is the 33rd anniversary of the eternally controversial Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision. In this part, I'll take a close look at the important elements of that decision.