Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Wednesday Night, and... | Next: Back to My Roots >>

Dating Update
Wednesday, 2005 April 27 - 11:29 pm
News... sort of.

So there's a girl on-line, Beth, who responded to one of my missives. She seems cute and nice. I wrote her again and she hasn't responded yet. I'm always suspicious that my follow-up e-mails are somehow getting lost in the system, but I have no way to verify that except to send more e-mails, and that would make me seem PSYCHO. I certainly wouldn't want the truth to get out.

I have a theory that one shouldn't be too aggressive, even if one is the Male Who Is Traditionally Supposed To Be Aggressive. In my theory of dating, one person is the "chaser" and the other is the "chased", and it is the latter who holds all the power in a relationship. Of course, in a healthy relationship, there's a level of equity that's achieved over time, but in the beginning, it's all about having "Hand".



Because of this theory, I try not to be overly complimentary or poetic right off the bat. Usually, in my opening e-mail, I will try to say something funny and off-the-wall. It's my way of distracting the girl and getting her "shields" down. It's the on-line equivalent of saying "Hey, look over THERE!" while buying her a martini, and then afterwards saying "Hmm, where did THAT come from?"

Oh, and by the way, I should point out that I'm STILL single, despite all of these BRILLIANT strategies.

An Asian girl wrote to me today, asking what part of Asia I was from. I guess it's not enough to be Asian, I have to be a particular brand of Asian. I want to write back, "I'm from a little-known part of Asia called Wernicke's Aph-Asia. I didn't really understand what you just said." But I don't think she would get it.

I wish I could write my own questions to screen these girls. Back in college, I made a ten-point scoring system to rate a girl's personality. Have I mentioned that I am was a huge geek? Each of these items was worth a point:

- having a willingness to talk openly and emotionally
- having a quick sense of humor
- having a carefree spirit and an unabashed attitude
- being eccentric and romantic in thoughts and actions
- having a willingness to make sacrifices for others, and to graciously accept sacrifices from others
- not having a need to be the center of attention
- being generally happy and smiling
- being genuine, without ulterior motives or pretense
- being clever and insightful
- having confidence, but tempered by humility

I've only ever met one person who scored a '10' on this scale, and that was Gretchen Fuqua, a girl I knew in college who was just perfect. I knew her for just one semester. She had a steady boyfriend at the time, and we never dated. But I always thought we had a special connection. She was my first instance of the "Chasing Amy" syndrome; for years after I knew her, I compared other women to her.

If I still used a ten-point scoring system, it would be different now... but I'm not so much a fan of using scoring systems any more. It seems so rigid. Now I only have one basic question: "Are you funny when you're drunk?" That tells me most of what I need to know.
Permalink  3 Comment   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: datinglife

Comments

Comment #1 from Jen (Guest)
2005 Apr 28 - 1:05 am : #
Isn't it more important to ask, "Are you funny when I'm drunk?"
Comment #2 from Crouching Hamster (Guest)
2005 Apr 28 - 1:26 am : #
I found out where all the cute Asian girls hang out in New York: Tonic. But they hang out with the pasty faced avant garde jazz geeks. Weird.
Comment #3 from MonoCerdo (Guest)
2005 Apr 28 - 10:49 am : #
OH NO YOU DID NOT JUST GO AND BRING UP THE WERNICKE AREA!!! That's my favorite language processing center! It totally puts Broca's to shame. Seriously, though. That may be one of the best jokes I've ever heard incorporating a language processing center. I'm in awe.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind