On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre... Ken said: |
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b... |
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre... Dan* said: |
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale... |
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview Dan* said: |
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ... |
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P... Ken said: |
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath... |
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P... Dan* said: |
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that... |
Movies: The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe | Monday, 2005 December 19 - 8:38 am |
No, it's not another Lord of the Rings movie. So, WOW. The latest screen adaptation of C.S. Lewis's "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe" is pretty spectacular. I've seen two other adaptations, one of them animated, and the other a low-budget made-for-TV affair. After seeing this latest one, I'll assert that this movie could only be made properly with modern computer-generated graphics (and with a large budget). In 1988 (when the last version was made), the technology to properly render a talking beaver simply did not exist. The whole magic of Narnia comes in having a believable alternate world. If you see a guy in a giant beaver suit, that doesn't quite give the same sense of wonder as an actual talking beaver. Cool special effects aside, the strength of this movie is in the casting. 10-year-old Georgie Henley is simply brilliant as Lucy Pevensie, showing range and emotion far beyond her years. And Tilda Swinton is wonderfully chilling as the White Witch. The screenplay is pretty faithful to the book. For the most part, that works; but there are a couple of scenes and bits of dialogue that don't translate very well to the screen. They seemed to be inserted out of necessity, simply because anyone who read the book would have demanded to see those scenes. In other parts, it seemed like they cut out some scenes that would have been interesting but didn't advance the plot, leaving the final adaptation feeling a little bit impersonal. I would have preferred they had not inserted a new action sequence (the frozen river scene) and instead worked in more character development. One other notable thing for me: I thought the soundtrack was excellent. For a lot of people, it'll just be background music; but if you pay attention, there's some really good stuff in there. Here's the requisite comparison to "The Lord of the Rings" movies: - Direction - better paced, but sometimes a little too hurried - Acting - better in the lead characters, not as good in the supporting cast - Effects - not quite as spectacular, and a few gaffes; but for the most part, believable Rating: 4 / 5 |
Permalink
Posted by Ken in: movies, reviews |
There are no comments on this article. |