Banner Logo
Home
The Real Kato
About Me
Twitter
Facebook
Frozen Lunches
Links
Kottke
Daring Fireball
Amalah
Secret Agent Josephine
Dooce
Contact



Archives
Most Recent

2024 April
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December
2003 November
2003 October
2003 September


Categories
All Categories 

bloggers 
books 
commentary 
dating 
food 
funnyhaha 
interesting 
life 
movies 
music 
politics 
reviews 
science 
site-business 
sports 
style 
techwatch 
television 
theater 
travel 


Recent Comments
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Ken said:
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b...
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre...
Dan* said:
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale...
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview
Dan* said:
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Ken said:
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath...
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P...
Dan* said:
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that...


<< Previous: Album: Avril Lavigne... | Next: Theater: The King an... >>

Speaking Up for Gay Marriage Rights
Wednesday, 2004 July 14 - 11:25 pm
Over the last few days, there was a drive to influence the Senate to vote against the proposed Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. One could log onto MoveOn.org, a liberal activist web site, to send a petition letter. Here's the letter I sent.

I am not gay, and I am not a gay rights activist. But this crusade against gay marriage simply must stop.

It is nobody's intent to destroy the sanctity of the marriage institution, or to somehow cheapen the value of marriage. But allowing gay people to marry is not an attack on the institution, and it seems hateful to call it that. When interracial marriage was legalized, did that destroy the institution of marriage? Should we also deny the marriage rights to Muslims, atheists, alcoholics, and Jennifer Lopez? Perhaps if anyone should be denied the right to marry, it would be politicians who want to vandalize the beauty and love of the marriage process by using it as an election-year tool of political division.

There are other issues at stake here. Marriage carries legal rights, rights that we would be denying to a class of people if we were to pass this proposed amendment. This would be the first time in our proud history that we would specifically amend the Constitution to take away rights from our citizens. It would be a day that future generations will look back on in shame, just as today we look back on slavery in shame.

For those of you who are married, I ask you: when a gay marriage ceremony is performed, is your marriage made less significant? Does the love of your spouse diminish?

When we were children, we were taught to share our toys. We now have the chance to show that we can share something even greater: love. We have the chance to offer millions of people one of the greatest joys that life can offer. Would you pass up that chance?
Permalink   Bookmark and Share
Posted by Ken in: politics

Comments

There are no comments on this article.

Comments are closed for this post.
Login


Search This Site
Powered by FreeFind