On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre... Ken said: |
Yeah, we've both had our share of hope and disappointment in this game. Let's just hope for a good b... |
On College Football 2022: Week 6 Recap and Week 7 Pre... Dan* said: |
I'm not sure how I feel about this game. On one hand, I feel pretty optimistic that we have the tale... |
On College Football 2022: Week 1 Preview Dan* said: |
Glad to see you'll be back writing football again, Ken! Congrats on the easy win today. You didn't ... |
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P... Ken said: |
Yeah, sorry one of our teams had to lose. I've come to appreciate Penn State as a classy and sympath... |
On College Football 2021: Week 10 Recap and Week 11 P... Dan* said: |
Hey Ken, congratulations on the win yesterday! Some really odd choices by our coaching staff in that... |
Books: The Lost Symbol | Sunday, 2009 September 27 - 10:47 am |
Dan Brown's recently released (and highly anticipated) novel, The Lost Symbol, is another Robert Langdon saga in the vein of The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons. Langdon's new world-changing puzzle has to do with the Freemasons and their most closely guarded secrets... which may have something to do with "noetic science", the idea that the human mind is capable of influencing matter by thought alone. Much like The Da Vinci Code, this book is full of realistic-sounding "facts" about science and history that readers are expected to take at face value, at least for the sake of the story. The problem is that Dan Brown spends so much time explaining and defending these "facts" that the dialogue seems forced, like the characters are reading out of Wikipedia. "I see. So what exactly are these . . . Ancient Mysteries?" There is a lot of dialogue like this, and it's not just Langdon who seems to have an encyclopedic knowledge of history, architecture, religion, symbology, and etymology. After a while, that makes the characters seem somewhat less than believable. And again, like The Da Vinci Code, the story is a non-stop chase, it features a wacko villain who performs rituals while naked (oh yes, the phrase "sex organ" is used more than once in this book), and there's a female sidekick for Langdon who is an intelligent, pretty, older woman. At times, I have to wonder where Brown's fascination with naked psychotic men and sexy older women comes from. The book wouldn't be a Robert Langdon story without a few puzzles, and he sprinkles them in throughout. The puzzles are somewhat unsatisfying; either they're too easy to figure out, or they're impossible to understand until Brown reveals a hidden clue. So while the book was engaging, it wasn't engrossing. Halfway through I was tempted to just skip to the ending. If you're a Dan Brown fan, I think you'll appreciate the style and the pace of the story... but you'll also probably guess most of the plot twists before they happen, and you'll find yourself thinking, "Guh, this is just like his other books... except somewhat less believable." Rating: 2.5 / 5 |
Permalink
Posted by Ken in: books, reviews |
There are no comments on this article. |